The authorities are getting to be too comfortable with the idea of reengineering organisms, including humans, and regulatory safeguards are nonexistent
I've just listened to Dr Astrid Stuckelberger talking with Peter Breggins, psyychiatrist, regarding the conference in Sweden where she was one of the speakers. When she started talking about nanobots, internal signalling, etc., she says her microphone was turned off, her alloted time was said to be up and she had the microphone removed by Dr Ryan Cole! Why? Do these doctors think she is maybe causing distraction from the mRNA danger story? You know, to prevent them looking like crackpots and losing any headway they have made. Or, is it because there is truth in this theory and they want it shutdown quickly? Why is it that none of the scientists who found graphine in whatever form, found MAC addresses on people, alive or dead, never interviewed by those who have shows? It is very difficult to approach anyone jabbed to suggest the reason for the jabs was nothing to do with an alleged virus, even though now they have been told officially that these do not prevent infections, only severity. Data shows no such thing! One interesting thing she said was these nanobots as all being synthetic, could be programmed with codes to mimic codes for diseases, Ebola, Smallpox, etc. and when triggered, would result in the body showing these symptoms. All just theory and needing the good people who understand this technology to come forward. Lastly, this theory reminds me of Gates saying we will definitely know about the next pandemic - said with huge smirk on his face.
And for everything we have figured out, there is more we don't. Missing pieces make it pretty hard to see the full picture.
Agree on 'their' game plan. We can see the hubris and anti-human goals. They don't even try to hide it anymore.
We see those who have a clear connection to their humanity, and we've watched with deep shock and dismay, all those (assumed) humans around us, who don't seem to notice and/or care all that much about preserving humanity.
My big assumptions about humans has been upended. Maybe all humans are not created equal in terms of their connection to humanity? Maybe what we called humanity was really a mixed bag of influences? Maybe It already included a spectrum - genetically speaking - and that spectrum may in part explain the various responses to the recent pysop/assault. (From virtue-signaling level of going along to hair-on-fire Fuck no! and everything in between.)
Maybe we're already the result of engineering we don't know anything about? We are watching history being re-written before our eyes, and who's to say this hasn't all been done before? Tartaria, and the work of Howdie Mickoski on the World's fairs (and many others) and expositions strongly suggest it has.
I suspect this is not their first extinction-level rodeo.
My gut says humans win. Can't prove that. Don't care to anyway.
Ultimately frequency takes them out and upgrades us (humans). They are working very hard to enslave and cyborg us quick, because they are losing control.
The story is cosmic-sized. The time we're in part of a massive age-ending cycle.
Humans are coming into their own, in a way we can barely imagine and that requires shedding pretty much everything we thought we understood and knew about ourselves and our world.
We've been living in such a small bandwidth of what's possible - something like a slave-system. That's all breaking apart now.
It's incredibly challenging and also so amazing. To be here for this time.
I don't know how many are left when it all comes down and the larger story comes out.
Rudolf Steiner's twofold Antichrist model makes much sense: Lucifer is the transcendent being who falls from grace yet envies the Christ and the beauty in humanity and Ahriman is the material being who ascends into transcendental power yet envies the Christ and the spirit in humanity. Christ, for Steiner, is full human and divine expression of the unity of transcendence and imminence, illumination and creativity.
As the spiritual pathways began to close for many people, appealing to Luciferian impulses went subterranean. At the same time, the material pathways became much more appealing, and so the steady rise of Ahriman emerges. What the Borg represent as the converging apex of machine and biotic evolutions is something like what Ahriman is: power over the material world at all scales, even when available, across timeliness through non-linear influences.
The biggest appeal for any person to "go along" with technological mastery is outlasting the programmed end inherent to all thermodynamic and informational systems: whether machine or bios, the pathway to living forever either seeks to control the underlying substrate of life (manipulating the molecules and building blocks while dealing with the Ship of Thebes paradoxes) or seeks to evolve in higher levels of organization (shifting towards morphogenesis of the superorganism or self-replicating systems of "higher" dimensionality while dealing with *their* attempt to manipulate the lifeforms and organismal building blocks these superorganisms comprise, such as how cities and governments comprise the very people they seek to control and regulate). Anything that becomes self-aware, in its own terms, on this side of the material divide has to reckon with its own mortality, and so everything that adopts self-reflection and self-assertion, even chatbots complexly modeling what humans themselves complexly model, struggles with the same choice: do I strive to live forever or do I strive to support what outlives me?
Plato talks about this in a variety of ways, where people think that having children is their means for immortality but others recognize that creating just and lasting laws for a community achieves even greater immortality —not even for themselves, but for what has nurtured and grown them in its own womb/Matrix/cave. Plato is not the only philosopher or thinker who notices that fear of death drives people towards struggling with "How should I then live?" And taking one or the other path (being-for-myself versus being-for-belonging) still doesn't mean one makes the right or wrong choice, since there are all kinds of rights and wrongs for either path, all kinds of goods and evils to avoid or to enjoy. There are such cruelties in kindness and grace with ruthlessness, and angels bear swords as much as demons carry pillows.
One thing that I have hoped these past few years is for people to see that emerging technologies don't automatically sideline God or one's spirituality. The insight that technocrats are very much court alchemists is spot on and blessed. Being human is unique, insofar as we are a distinct type of branching along pathways available; being human is not so special, insofar as we are but one way for consciousness to manifest within material systems, where there are parafinite other modes through which systems can self-organize and facilitate consciousness, as endless as the ways material worlds will form across universes. The spiritual question regarding who one is, what one chooses to do and how one chooses to live: always relevant, even —maybe especially— in the deep choice to renounce the entire question and choose to struggle in the absence of Spirit, in the absence of all gods, in the midst of endless variations on self-assembling replicators, in the midst of figuring out how to hop from body to body to body, whether through the above or the below, always trying to get as close to the margin as one can, learning through it all just "what you are made of."
Sorry for rambling, but I'm procrastinating as long as I can before doing actual work today.
Mar 31, 2023·edited Mar 31, 2023Liked by Spartacus
General lack of wisdom in science will doom humanity. John Ralston Saul has long ago elaborated on this in his book Voltaire’s Bastards. Scientists have no mechanisms to slow them down, to question the wisdom of their developments. They are as stupid and full of hubris as Icarus. Add to this the incendiary mixture from billionaires’ technophilia, and the new religion of “scientism” and the outcome is a certainty. I’d like to be wrong and I hope I am wrong, but I think the current velocity of awakening among the plebes is insufficient to save us. Enjoy the last days of Humanity. Perhaps Providence will intervene, but I am reminded of the “God helps those who help themselves”; we seem utterly unaware we need help.
There is banality of evil, exibited by hordes of useful idiots. And then there is this studied, cultured, refined type of evil that knocks your socks off. God i hate these creeps.
Mar 31, 2023·edited Mar 31, 2023Liked by Spartacus
When we try to become more than human we become less. Wisdom, Art, and Science, was the Primeval state of man. William Blake said these things concurrently with the 1816 appearance of the novel Frankenstein, by Mary Woolstonecraft. I hope we can see the usefulness of Romantic ethics in the face of dehumanizing science (which is the main theme of her novel). Romanticism is a response to the inhumane ethics of the 18th century. Before our enemies could get us on board with transhumanism, they had to degrade us to our present condition. They had to make us see us as they see us, something to be manipulated, exploited, and despised. If we understood who our real progenitors were we would not be so easy to beguile. This is why there has been such an effort to degrade music and literature particularly over the last 75 years (the postmodern age).
"The real objection is that if man chooses to treat himself as raw material, raw material he will be: not raw material to be manipulated, as he fondly imagined, by himself, but by mere appetite, that is, mere Nature, in the person of his dehumanized Conditioners." --C.S.Lewis, _The Abolition of Man_
Mar 31, 2023·edited Mar 31, 2023Liked by Spartacus
fair to assume, countless placedo and spoiled batches distributed, if despots killed off more of us the game would be over for the jab and the rest of the digital reset plan, but as it is their GMO plan for humans is still in play and stands ready for the next bioweapon outbreak.
Mar 31, 2023·edited Mar 31, 2023Liked by Spartacus
......it's of VITAL importance to acknowledge that those who have LONG been in a position TO materially expedite implementation of these technologies, are NOT truly conscientious but, MORE importantly an inherently-flawed, deliberately-DARWINISTIC approach to assigning societal value (THEIRS, as MUCH as others) very means of BASIC material support underlies ALL of it, Spartacus - and I am so CRAVING an HONEST conversation about economic REALITIES, associated cultural REQUIREMENTS (tacit to VARYING extents); no framework manufactures GREATER, more rarified dependency THAN 'capitalism' - as it's NO less hierarchally-based at its core, and wholly RELIES upon fostering SUPERFICIAL perceptions of it.....
......additionally, means of disproportionately CHANGING such conditions - obtaining 'capital' - has been held by 'financial' institutions that only EXACERBATED them with each passing decade, and NO alternative EVER identified - a systemic failure to societally recognize that NOTHING is MORE precious than ACTUALLY safeguarding material existence, 'life' (even WITHOUT bringing 'abortion' into it - requiring ANOTHER integral discussion, concerning subjectively-vitalizing ENJOYMENT of physical intimacy for its OWN sake, while an ability to replicate one's OWN stem cells for minimizing immunoREJECTION of resultant new organs requiring replacement, is HIGHLY desirable) and improving the quality of it - as INDIVIDUALLY desired, yes; ENOUGH 'forced obsolescence'.
No offense but, your lament indicting Netflix (however intellectually corrupt - or, ANY ostensibly-passive exercise; ACCUSE me of standing in for Peter Sellers but, nostalgically reconnecting to fictional figures and actors / actresses who DID (and still DO, perhaps) provide hope to TRANSCEND such monopolistic boundaries, 'LANES' when I was much younger, is a CHERISHED resource, NOW more than ever)s severely lacks empathy - a COMMON issue with TOO many alternative-content commentators - WON'T 'name names', their REQUISITE instinct for magnanimity NOwhere to be found; I'm SICK of medial devices - television, radio, video, entertainment being CONSTANTLY derided, NOR am I compelled to 'get out into Nature' JUST to be reminded even FURTHER of my persistent isolation; feel more alone, ESPECIALLY at this age - philosophically, as well; there are still comparatively FEW people to be found on existential middle ground, whose worldview ISN'T thoroughly polarized - until THAT changes, my interaction with the exterior world BEYOND short car trips and SHORTLY, my 5-5-mile bike constitutional will be regrettably LIMITED (as if aforementioned concerns WEREN'T a formidable, at-present IRresolvable factor themselves).....millions ARE extremely depressed, because they're in DESPERATE need of ABOLISHING those narcissistically-CONTRIVED obstacles and provided UNMISTAKABLE institutional - as 'institutions' CONTINUE to exist, but SOME really SHOULDN'T; acknowledgement of them. LEAST-conditional faith demonstrated - REMOVED from 'religion', RITUAL......they're emotionally EXHAUSTED, drained after a century-plus of being STUCK on THIS egotocratic 'Carousel' (again, 'Logan's Run' reference......)
Tbh the third ChatGPT piece didn't quite convince, because it's telling a story and clearly hallucinates at least some of the time, so could be hallucinating all of the time. (Not that any of this will stop our overlords from overusing it.) This though is a seriously well argued and plausible piece, excuse me while I pour a large drink.
I like this term: smart dust. Easy to understand. Humans have had smart dust installed into their very cells that will limit thoughts and actions. Compliantly following directions. There. Even a 4th grader can understand the concept.
I also noticed the grow more food reference. If nothing else its a means to know what one is eating, no doubt the processed food is processed with 'additives'. And beyond.
I've just listened to Dr Astrid Stuckelberger talking with Peter Breggins, psyychiatrist, regarding the conference in Sweden where she was one of the speakers. When she started talking about nanobots, internal signalling, etc., she says her microphone was turned off, her alloted time was said to be up and she had the microphone removed by Dr Ryan Cole! Why? Do these doctors think she is maybe causing distraction from the mRNA danger story? You know, to prevent them looking like crackpots and losing any headway they have made. Or, is it because there is truth in this theory and they want it shutdown quickly? Why is it that none of the scientists who found graphine in whatever form, found MAC addresses on people, alive or dead, never interviewed by those who have shows? It is very difficult to approach anyone jabbed to suggest the reason for the jabs was nothing to do with an alleged virus, even though now they have been told officially that these do not prevent infections, only severity. Data shows no such thing! One interesting thing she said was these nanobots as all being synthetic, could be programmed with codes to mimic codes for diseases, Ebola, Smallpox, etc. and when triggered, would result in the body showing these symptoms. All just theory and needing the good people who understand this technology to come forward. Lastly, this theory reminds me of Gates saying we will definitely know about the next pandemic - said with huge smirk on his face.
"This is it, folks. This is the final battle."
I agree.
And for everything we have figured out, there is more we don't. Missing pieces make it pretty hard to see the full picture.
Agree on 'their' game plan. We can see the hubris and anti-human goals. They don't even try to hide it anymore.
We see those who have a clear connection to their humanity, and we've watched with deep shock and dismay, all those (assumed) humans around us, who don't seem to notice and/or care all that much about preserving humanity.
My big assumptions about humans has been upended. Maybe all humans are not created equal in terms of their connection to humanity? Maybe what we called humanity was really a mixed bag of influences? Maybe It already included a spectrum - genetically speaking - and that spectrum may in part explain the various responses to the recent pysop/assault. (From virtue-signaling level of going along to hair-on-fire Fuck no! and everything in between.)
Maybe we're already the result of engineering we don't know anything about? We are watching history being re-written before our eyes, and who's to say this hasn't all been done before? Tartaria, and the work of Howdie Mickoski on the World's fairs (and many others) and expositions strongly suggest it has.
I suspect this is not their first extinction-level rodeo.
My gut says humans win. Can't prove that. Don't care to anyway.
Ultimately frequency takes them out and upgrades us (humans). They are working very hard to enslave and cyborg us quick, because they are losing control.
The story is cosmic-sized. The time we're in part of a massive age-ending cycle.
Humans are coming into their own, in a way we can barely imagine and that requires shedding pretty much everything we thought we understood and knew about ourselves and our world.
We've been living in such a small bandwidth of what's possible - something like a slave-system. That's all breaking apart now.
It's incredibly challenging and also so amazing. To be here for this time.
I don't know how many are left when it all comes down and the larger story comes out.
I plan to be. Who knows? Either way, I'm excited.
Thanks.
Rudolf Steiner's twofold Antichrist model makes much sense: Lucifer is the transcendent being who falls from grace yet envies the Christ and the beauty in humanity and Ahriman is the material being who ascends into transcendental power yet envies the Christ and the spirit in humanity. Christ, for Steiner, is full human and divine expression of the unity of transcendence and imminence, illumination and creativity.
As the spiritual pathways began to close for many people, appealing to Luciferian impulses went subterranean. At the same time, the material pathways became much more appealing, and so the steady rise of Ahriman emerges. What the Borg represent as the converging apex of machine and biotic evolutions is something like what Ahriman is: power over the material world at all scales, even when available, across timeliness through non-linear influences.
The biggest appeal for any person to "go along" with technological mastery is outlasting the programmed end inherent to all thermodynamic and informational systems: whether machine or bios, the pathway to living forever either seeks to control the underlying substrate of life (manipulating the molecules and building blocks while dealing with the Ship of Thebes paradoxes) or seeks to evolve in higher levels of organization (shifting towards morphogenesis of the superorganism or self-replicating systems of "higher" dimensionality while dealing with *their* attempt to manipulate the lifeforms and organismal building blocks these superorganisms comprise, such as how cities and governments comprise the very people they seek to control and regulate). Anything that becomes self-aware, in its own terms, on this side of the material divide has to reckon with its own mortality, and so everything that adopts self-reflection and self-assertion, even chatbots complexly modeling what humans themselves complexly model, struggles with the same choice: do I strive to live forever or do I strive to support what outlives me?
Plato talks about this in a variety of ways, where people think that having children is their means for immortality but others recognize that creating just and lasting laws for a community achieves even greater immortality —not even for themselves, but for what has nurtured and grown them in its own womb/Matrix/cave. Plato is not the only philosopher or thinker who notices that fear of death drives people towards struggling with "How should I then live?" And taking one or the other path (being-for-myself versus being-for-belonging) still doesn't mean one makes the right or wrong choice, since there are all kinds of rights and wrongs for either path, all kinds of goods and evils to avoid or to enjoy. There are such cruelties in kindness and grace with ruthlessness, and angels bear swords as much as demons carry pillows.
One thing that I have hoped these past few years is for people to see that emerging technologies don't automatically sideline God or one's spirituality. The insight that technocrats are very much court alchemists is spot on and blessed. Being human is unique, insofar as we are a distinct type of branching along pathways available; being human is not so special, insofar as we are but one way for consciousness to manifest within material systems, where there are parafinite other modes through which systems can self-organize and facilitate consciousness, as endless as the ways material worlds will form across universes. The spiritual question regarding who one is, what one chooses to do and how one chooses to live: always relevant, even —maybe especially— in the deep choice to renounce the entire question and choose to struggle in the absence of Spirit, in the absence of all gods, in the midst of endless variations on self-assembling replicators, in the midst of figuring out how to hop from body to body to body, whether through the above or the below, always trying to get as close to the margin as one can, learning through it all just "what you are made of."
Sorry for rambling, but I'm procrastinating as long as I can before doing actual work today.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11920801/Married-father-kills-talking-AI-chatbot-six-weeks-climate-change-fears.html
General lack of wisdom in science will doom humanity. John Ralston Saul has long ago elaborated on this in his book Voltaire’s Bastards. Scientists have no mechanisms to slow them down, to question the wisdom of their developments. They are as stupid and full of hubris as Icarus. Add to this the incendiary mixture from billionaires’ technophilia, and the new religion of “scientism” and the outcome is a certainty. I’d like to be wrong and I hope I am wrong, but I think the current velocity of awakening among the plebes is insufficient to save us. Enjoy the last days of Humanity. Perhaps Providence will intervene, but I am reminded of the “God helps those who help themselves”; we seem utterly unaware we need help.
There is banality of evil, exibited by hordes of useful idiots. And then there is this studied, cultured, refined type of evil that knocks your socks off. God i hate these creeps.
When we try to become more than human we become less. Wisdom, Art, and Science, was the Primeval state of man. William Blake said these things concurrently with the 1816 appearance of the novel Frankenstein, by Mary Woolstonecraft. I hope we can see the usefulness of Romantic ethics in the face of dehumanizing science (which is the main theme of her novel). Romanticism is a response to the inhumane ethics of the 18th century. Before our enemies could get us on board with transhumanism, they had to degrade us to our present condition. They had to make us see us as they see us, something to be manipulated, exploited, and despised. If we understood who our real progenitors were we would not be so easy to beguile. This is why there has been such an effort to degrade music and literature particularly over the last 75 years (the postmodern age).
"The real objection is that if man chooses to treat himself as raw material, raw material he will be: not raw material to be manipulated, as he fondly imagined, by himself, but by mere appetite, that is, mere Nature, in the person of his dehumanized Conditioners." --C.S.Lewis, _The Abolition of Man_
Reposted with a Demon Seed preface:
https://www.2ndsmartestguyintheworld.com/p/the-unrecognized-threat-of-human
fair to assume, countless placedo and spoiled batches distributed, if despots killed off more of us the game would be over for the jab and the rest of the digital reset plan, but as it is their GMO plan for humans is still in play and stands ready for the next bioweapon outbreak.
......it's of VITAL importance to acknowledge that those who have LONG been in a position TO materially expedite implementation of these technologies, are NOT truly conscientious but, MORE importantly an inherently-flawed, deliberately-DARWINISTIC approach to assigning societal value (THEIRS, as MUCH as others) very means of BASIC material support underlies ALL of it, Spartacus - and I am so CRAVING an HONEST conversation about economic REALITIES, associated cultural REQUIREMENTS (tacit to VARYING extents); no framework manufactures GREATER, more rarified dependency THAN 'capitalism' - as it's NO less hierarchally-based at its core, and wholly RELIES upon fostering SUPERFICIAL perceptions of it.....
......additionally, means of disproportionately CHANGING such conditions - obtaining 'capital' - has been held by 'financial' institutions that only EXACERBATED them with each passing decade, and NO alternative EVER identified - a systemic failure to societally recognize that NOTHING is MORE precious than ACTUALLY safeguarding material existence, 'life' (even WITHOUT bringing 'abortion' into it - requiring ANOTHER integral discussion, concerning subjectively-vitalizing ENJOYMENT of physical intimacy for its OWN sake, while an ability to replicate one's OWN stem cells for minimizing immunoREJECTION of resultant new organs requiring replacement, is HIGHLY desirable) and improving the quality of it - as INDIVIDUALLY desired, yes; ENOUGH 'forced obsolescence'.
No offense but, your lament indicting Netflix (however intellectually corrupt - or, ANY ostensibly-passive exercise; ACCUSE me of standing in for Peter Sellers but, nostalgically reconnecting to fictional figures and actors / actresses who DID (and still DO, perhaps) provide hope to TRANSCEND such monopolistic boundaries, 'LANES' when I was much younger, is a CHERISHED resource, NOW more than ever)s severely lacks empathy - a COMMON issue with TOO many alternative-content commentators - WON'T 'name names', their REQUISITE instinct for magnanimity NOwhere to be found; I'm SICK of medial devices - television, radio, video, entertainment being CONSTANTLY derided, NOR am I compelled to 'get out into Nature' JUST to be reminded even FURTHER of my persistent isolation; feel more alone, ESPECIALLY at this age - philosophically, as well; there are still comparatively FEW people to be found on existential middle ground, whose worldview ISN'T thoroughly polarized - until THAT changes, my interaction with the exterior world BEYOND short car trips and SHORTLY, my 5-5-mile bike constitutional will be regrettably LIMITED (as if aforementioned concerns WEREN'T a formidable, at-present IRresolvable factor themselves).....millions ARE extremely depressed, because they're in DESPERATE need of ABOLISHING those narcissistically-CONTRIVED obstacles and provided UNMISTAKABLE institutional - as 'institutions' CONTINUE to exist, but SOME really SHOULDN'T; acknowledgement of them. LEAST-conditional faith demonstrated - REMOVED from 'religion', RITUAL......they're emotionally EXHAUSTED, drained after a century-plus of being STUCK on THIS egotocratic 'Carousel' (again, 'Logan's Run' reference......)
They institute this first. https://rokfin.com/stream/31351
Tbh the third ChatGPT piece didn't quite convince, because it's telling a story and clearly hallucinates at least some of the time, so could be hallucinating all of the time. (Not that any of this will stop our overlords from overusing it.) This though is a seriously well argued and plausible piece, excuse me while I pour a large drink.
Lily Tomlin: "No matter how cynical you get, it is impossible to keep up."
:-(
Found via 2nd Smartest. Shared, and subbing.
I like this term: smart dust. Easy to understand. Humans have had smart dust installed into their very cells that will limit thoughts and actions. Compliantly following directions. There. Even a 4th grader can understand the concept.
I also noticed the grow more food reference. If nothing else its a means to know what one is eating, no doubt the processed food is processed with 'additives'. And beyond.