"In 1954 this was the issue of primary concern. Although the so-called "moral issues" were raised, in view of the law of natural selection it was agreed that a nation or world of people who will not use their intelligence are no better than animals who do not have intelligence. Such a people are beasts of burden and steaks on the table by choice and consent."
it's not complicated. to "build back better" one necessarily starts by destroying everything including what is actually good. They've been doing this for a long time. Everybody who isn't hiding most of their income from them is being quite helpful in their own destruction, and yet they invariably think that they're good citizens.
Interesting read Spartacus. I see the validity of your hypothesis that the rich and powerful want to eliminate the “useless eaters” but while reading this article I couldn’t help but think of the opposite dynamic currently at work. There’s a segment of the rich and powerful that tax and spend enormous sums of money to keep the useless eaters alive by paying for their welfare, housing, internet access, stimulus money, etc. Maybe they want a world of dependent slaves and eliminate the independent thinkers?
This case from a century ago still stands as American jurisprudence. Never overturned. Not even after Buck v. Bell was raised as a defense to crimes against humanity by defendants at the Nuremberg trials -"You Americans approved of it, what's the big deal?" Only mildly tempered in Skinner v. Oklahoma in 1942. Upheld in cases as recent as the early 2000's.
AND...Buck v. Bell is guiding the laws and bioethics governing Newgenics in the emerging field of biotech, CRSPR, designer babies, transhumanism, euthanasia, etc:
Buck v. Bell, American Eugenics, and the Bad Man Test:
Putting Limits on Newgenics in the 21st Century
Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality, January, 2020
There's a reason Buck v Bell has stood for over a century, many reasons. Like the ones you satirically indulge. "Three generations of imbeciles" is considered settled law in the US, stare decisis. Saying that government-imposed eugenics is constitutional.
But, that's not surprising, considering that the very first Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court John Jay wrote in one of his early opinions, "The People Who Own the Country Ought to Govern It":
The Supreme Court, hegemony, and Its Consequences
Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality, December, 1987
And they are governing it as they see fit. The men and women in black robes are nothing more than high priests selected to enforce the will of those who own this country over the will of the majority of the people. Because the law is just words subject to the interpretation of rulers. And in their Darth Vader voice they are saying, "We've altered the deal. Pray we don't alter it further."
don't reproduce. Only people like ursula are allowed to. Just found out she got 7 kids. Gates and schwab have kids. They should do what they preach. If there are too many people, they should be the first to go. Call trudeau for some kits. Then their children and grandchildren. Same for those who stand with israel - you go first. I read the US military has not enough recrutes, they cannot fight 3 wars at a time. Attacks on american soldiers in Syria... what are they doing there? Defending America? While at the Mexican border criminals from all over the world stream in? Build back better Ha! in his house may be. Another garage for the boxes with secret files... or a new home for his poor son...
Clearly Spartacus gets the appeal this has to all too many. So many have rapidly, lustfully, purposefully, selfishly bought into this Death Cult. They accept their life is worthless and only want to find usefulness and their special 'purpose' by taking their enemies, their loved ones, and everybody left with them. In this upside down dimension their 'altruism' is the elimination of humanity. Truly a Noble cause for the real victim. No different than death by cop for any front page mass murderer. Most people hearing this thought at least once while listening to the Jacob Rothschild look a like, "He made a good point there."
Listen: The earth has no purpose and doesn't exist without shared human observation. No humans, no shared observation. No shared observation, no earth. What evidence that the earth even exists without the human experience? Two monkeys sitting around the midnight campfire, one says George I'm curious, what's the meaning of life? George says, life has no meaning without humans to throw our shitz at.
Lol, yes, but to elaborate upon your satire just a bit more- this is the thinking of the plebian, ground level parasite who considers himself our overlords! ; ))
Next level up- the deluded and deranged by the thoughts of endless power over legions of Hackable animals, leaping into battle at their beck and call, or reduced to Carbon based robots, working away in the Borg tradition for the ravings of the latest lunatic mind, in Charge,
And finally, another level up, (or into the madness,) once again-
(to continue the satire, of course,) is the one groveling at the feet of his/her alter to Satan, committing the worshipful acts of "pulling off legs, disembowlments, etc." to achieve approval of their "god," and who thinks nothing of of throwing bits of themselves into it's maw as well.
Sorry, not enough coffee, yet, to get into my characters heads, and write from their points of view (not sure I'd go there with the coffee, either!) but perhaps we need to examine these mentally ill people just a bit more.
🤣👏😂
Thank you for that guffaw-packed Swiftian satire, Spartacus. It makes a delicious complement to my “Anatomy of a Philanthropath” series:
• “Part 1: A Mostly Peaceful Depopulation” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-a-philanthropath-dreams)
• “Part 2: Downloadable Digital Dictatorships” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-a-philanthropath-dreams-947)
• “Part 3: Yuval Noah Harari: Not the Man We Think He Is?” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/anatomy-of-a-philanthropath-dreams-3fd)
7 deadly words
I'm from the oligarchy, here to help.
In the spirit of satire may I suggest the following assortment of discriminating bumper stickers for the cattle to place on their vehicle of choice:
Save a cricket. Eat the elite.
What’s for dinner? Roast Schwab.
Achieve net zero! Strip the elite!
"In 1954 this was the issue of primary concern. Although the so-called "moral issues" were raised, in view of the law of natural selection it was agreed that a nation or world of people who will not use their intelligence are no better than animals who do not have intelligence. Such a people are beasts of burden and steaks on the table by choice and consent."
https://ia800100.us.archive.org/5/items/SilentWeaponsForQuietWarsOriginalDocumentCopy/Silent%20Weapons%20for%20Quiet%20Wars%20Original%20Document%20Copy.pdf
Dark
Brilliant!
WOW!! Dead on and its scary because it is coming!
it's not complicated. to "build back better" one necessarily starts by destroying everything including what is actually good. They've been doing this for a long time. Everybody who isn't hiding most of their income from them is being quite helpful in their own destruction, and yet they invariably think that they're good citizens.
Interesting read Spartacus. I see the validity of your hypothesis that the rich and powerful want to eliminate the “useless eaters” but while reading this article I couldn’t help but think of the opposite dynamic currently at work. There’s a segment of the rich and powerful that tax and spend enormous sums of money to keep the useless eaters alive by paying for their welfare, housing, internet access, stimulus money, etc. Maybe they want a world of dependent slaves and eliminate the independent thinkers?
"Three generations of imbeciles are enough." - Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes writing for the 8-1 majority in 1927 Buck v. Bell eugenics case:
Harvard’s dark past as the “brain trust” of American eugenics
BioEdge, February 25, 2016
bioedge.org/enhancement/harvards-dark-past-as-the-brain-trust-of-american-eugenics/
Buck v. Bell, Due Process of Law?
Political Research Quartely, 1953
https://sci-hub.se/https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/106591295300600409
This case from a century ago still stands as American jurisprudence. Never overturned. Not even after Buck v. Bell was raised as a defense to crimes against humanity by defendants at the Nuremberg trials -"You Americans approved of it, what's the big deal?" Only mildly tempered in Skinner v. Oklahoma in 1942. Upheld in cases as recent as the early 2000's.
AND...Buck v. Bell is guiding the laws and bioethics governing Newgenics in the emerging field of biotech, CRSPR, designer babies, transhumanism, euthanasia, etc:
Buck v. Bell, American Eugenics, and the Bad Man Test:
Putting Limits on Newgenics in the 21st Century
Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality, January, 2020
https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1622&context=lawineq
There's a reason Buck v Bell has stood for over a century, many reasons. Like the ones you satirically indulge. "Three generations of imbeciles" is considered settled law in the US, stare decisis. Saying that government-imposed eugenics is constitutional.
But, that's not surprising, considering that the very first Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court John Jay wrote in one of his early opinions, "The People Who Own the Country Ought to Govern It":
The Supreme Court, hegemony, and Its Consequences
Minnesota Journal of Law & Inequality, December, 1987
https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1371&context=lawineq
And they are governing it as they see fit. The men and women in black robes are nothing more than high priests selected to enforce the will of those who own this country over the will of the majority of the people. Because the law is just words subject to the interpretation of rulers. And in their Darth Vader voice they are saying, "We've altered the deal. Pray we don't alter it further."
don't reproduce. Only people like ursula are allowed to. Just found out she got 7 kids. Gates and schwab have kids. They should do what they preach. If there are too many people, they should be the first to go. Call trudeau for some kits. Then their children and grandchildren. Same for those who stand with israel - you go first. I read the US military has not enough recrutes, they cannot fight 3 wars at a time. Attacks on american soldiers in Syria... what are they doing there? Defending America? While at the Mexican border criminals from all over the world stream in? Build back better Ha! in his house may be. Another garage for the boxes with secret files... or a new home for his poor son...
The overclass must be really stupid and uncreative to be doing such subsistence work... I mean, farming dumb shits?
If I had access to the resources and power of these wankers, I would have focussed on ducks.
Ducks are very amusing, and tasty, and like eating bugs 😆
Clearly Spartacus gets the appeal this has to all too many. So many have rapidly, lustfully, purposefully, selfishly bought into this Death Cult. They accept their life is worthless and only want to find usefulness and their special 'purpose' by taking their enemies, their loved ones, and everybody left with them. In this upside down dimension their 'altruism' is the elimination of humanity. Truly a Noble cause for the real victim. No different than death by cop for any front page mass murderer. Most people hearing this thought at least once while listening to the Jacob Rothschild look a like, "He made a good point there."
Listen: The earth has no purpose and doesn't exist without shared human observation. No humans, no shared observation. No shared observation, no earth. What evidence that the earth even exists without the human experience? Two monkeys sitting around the midnight campfire, one says George I'm curious, what's the meaning of life? George says, life has no meaning without humans to throw our shitz at.
Lol, yes, but to elaborate upon your satire just a bit more- this is the thinking of the plebian, ground level parasite who considers himself our overlords! ; ))
Next level up- the deluded and deranged by the thoughts of endless power over legions of Hackable animals, leaping into battle at their beck and call, or reduced to Carbon based robots, working away in the Borg tradition for the ravings of the latest lunatic mind, in Charge,
And finally, another level up, (or into the madness,) once again-
(to continue the satire, of course,) is the one groveling at the feet of his/her alter to Satan, committing the worshipful acts of "pulling off legs, disembowlments, etc." to achieve approval of their "god," and who thinks nothing of of throwing bits of themselves into it's maw as well.
Sorry, not enough coffee, yet, to get into my characters heads, and write from their points of view (not sure I'd go there with the coffee, either!) but perhaps we need to examine these mentally ill people just a bit more.
: ))
Brilliant my good Substacker - you have have described my attitude perfectly. We are indeed Gods to the 99%: https://austrianpeter.substack.com/p/gods-rule-data-war-consult-vaxx-apathy?utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
I shall repost you for the benefit of my geriatric readers.
Dead solid perfect.