Thank you so much, Spartacus, for such meticulous research and insight. Grateful that you’re fighting on the side of light and truth against a world descending into darkness.
I'm still absorbing all this. There is a lot here and some stuff I can use immediately as I work with the state legislature to create appropriate protective legislation for the future. One clerical correction that will help: Never reference a Wikipedia article. I have proven to myself in multiple ways by looking up articles that have been my own experience or in which I have expert knowledge: Wiki is hopelessly corrupt, with revised histories, revised definitions, revised biographies, etc, to fit the ultra-left WEF worldview. (I financially supported Wiki for years, so I don't say this lightly.) I recommend that you remove those and replace with respectable references.
I agree, so I swapped them out. The main draw of those specific five reference articles was that they were free, and, as far as I could tell, both scientifically accurate and easy to read and understand. A lot of articles on the topic of redox physiology are gated behind paywalls. However, I was able to find alternatives for each topic.
My fuzzy memory is fantastic but details slow to stick and longer to trust so it works to revisit material to clear the fog if only briefly. No worries that's what bookmarks are for and they're free. Not enough is free, paywalls give me a big time cramp and page views to undeserving sources rubs me wrong too.
Luckily there's a no tech hack that also promotes my long time favorite Internet Archive Wayback Machine. Pasting a URL will turn up enough corp sources without feeding NYT, WaPo, Guardian and a good swath of paywall content captured by someone w access. Wayback also allows if you wish to link an unchangeable version of Wikipedia and not drive traffic to their site.
Once upon a time decades ago Monsanto's opponents had sizeable contributions there that did help inform before K-Street forces captured the platform but truth is like water it makes new paths to flow freely, lucky us! :~)
Bookmarks are the wrong way to retain access to web-hosted information, Pamela. That information -- particularly if it's contested, important or embarassing -- often gets edited or disappeared.
Your browser can save a webpage and it's contents (under the File: menu, or right-click 'Save As'). Don't neglect to organize your web downloads into meaningful categories by making sub-folders by topic.
Ray ,this is so important what Spartacus wrote. Yes it’s very long to read and understand from a medical point of view and corruption involved. Yes Vitamin C helps, but not alone in severe illness .
i said a main treatment not an only treatment. if you look, there are few studies done on IV Vit C treatment but where it has been done the results are incredible, yet in typical pharma fashion they are ignored and even suppressed. it is massive and been known for years but here we are barely used anywhere and we are still 'doing studies' https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31978969/
there are different types of Vit C with different absorption, in relation to sepsis, IV levels are required, but for daily protection i would recommend liquid liposomal Vit C, if you get a cold or flu ramp up the dose to every 2h and slowly taper off when you recover
You missed something. The heparin binding sites are only the tip of the amyloidogenesis iceberg. The N-protein inside the virus is insanely amyloidogenic:
But it's not just the N-protein. Neutrophil elastase (inflammation-produced enzyme) chops up the spike protein in such a way that the resulting peptides themselves are amyloidogenic. Preprint here, but it may have been published somewhere: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.16.472920v1
I have not seen that and I'm not qualified enough to give an opinion other than it fits the general amyloidogenesis pattern we seem to be seeing. I'm not a doctor or a scientist. I'm just a smart troll, who thought one day that it would be a great troll to write a fiction book about COVID implanting a "ticking time bomb" into our bodies and I knew about Mad Cow Disease, so I started looking for a plausible mechanism by which COVID could generate Mad Cow Disease years or decades later. And then I fell down this rabbit hole and discovered that my trollish theory is actually pretty much happening in real life and Mad Cow is not the only possible proteinopathy.
The problem with proteinopathies seems to be that all important knowledge about it is hidden in bioweapons research, because it would be trivial to weaponize this stuff. If you've got a mad cow, all you need is to aerosolize its brain and have people breathe it in and they die years later.
I'm guessing the US bioweapons guys saw the N-protein and were like "yeah, this is super bad, we can't have a regular vaccine, because it would include the N-protein and that would create proteinopathic diseases years later", so they created a vaccine around the S-protein, but they never figured that neutrophil elastase would chop that up into amyloidogenic peptides, which would act just like the N-protein. This could have been a super smart biohack by the Chinese -- fooling the Americans into creating a vaccine that causes proteinopathies.
When Omicron first came out, its only "sister strain" in the Nextstrain database was "hCoV-19/Russia/SPE-RII-MH17376S/2021" found in St. Petersburg on May 10th 2021. All other alleged "sister strains" of Omicron were added later and backdated. So Omicron is probably a delibaretely designed "natural vaccine" created by Biopreparat in Russia. I would like to see what the amyloidogenic potential of the Omicron N-protein and S-protein peptides is. If they reduced the potential, then it was delibaretely engineered.
Best cure for COVID is probably A-group cannabinoids (CBDA, CBGA, THCA) from raw cannabis plants simply blocking the spike protein by binding to it as per this article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35007072/
That's how I cured my COVID recently. I only had two days of fever and one day of tiredness.
"The binding epitope on S harbors a sequence motif unique to SARS-CoV-2 (not present in other SARS-related coronaviruses), which is highly similar in both sequence and structure to the bacterial superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin B."
Your links are entirely new information to me. I have never seen anything about SEB before, but I have a friend, who has been looking into MIS-C, so I asked him to take a look at the information you provided. Thank you!
It feels like so many of us have stumbled on some small piece of the puzzle.
if you want to go back further trace theKuru experiments at UC Davis, causing SIV cpz / HTLV/HIV then hiv spike added to corona, they've been trying to make zombies of us for half a century, kuru predates mad cow, and CJD
Jacquelyn, it started a long time ago. I presented a medical paper years ago in Texas. It was on the transport mechanism of endorphins and enkephalins. Afterwards, I got surrounded by Chinese scientists and my professor and lead researcher in the lab grabbed me and told that I was not to speak to them and said they steal peoples research.
Dad said something about how when you remove the incentive to do good work and be recognized for it, you will have done exactly that. And the Chinese culture has had 100+ years of trying to copy and then 'improve' on other inventions, that is how they built their country, right? Made in China, indeed. I do try and remember that the CCP and many of the Chinese people are not in agreement, just as we are not well represented by our Government. You have to meet and talk to individuals, a challenge.
I am pretty much paralysed by this information. It is so bleak!
It means the push for the vaccines will continue no matter what the side effects and efficacy. The majority of the west is anyways already injected and possibly loaded with those nano BCI devices so we could be very well doomed already. It almost feels like the only viable option is to just run for the caves and leave everything behind. We slept too long and now it is almost too late.
People in Canada stood up and they were attacked by (possibly foreign) police forces without faces and batches. In western europe we also go to protests but not sure if that has changed much.
What you write makes sense but is it actionable? How to resist this future?
It would seem that more eyes are opening. Example: there is an International “Grand Jury”(access on Rumble), per Reiner Fuellmich, that has been occurring recently with world type experts giving evidence as if in a real courtroom for the WORLD to see. While some of the speakers have accents making it a tad more difficult to listen to, many don’t and it’s very worth listening to. Hopefully, more of the world begins to accept the truth and stand behind making changes to prevent future worse scenarios & prosecute the psychopaths responsible!!! It makes my head spin considering the evil disregard for humanity!!!! I’ve been more or less unwell for almost 2 years recognizing something was very off with all this. It did keep me from getting vaxed at least! I mourn greatly for humanity with all the suffering that has occurred and will be occurring in the future!!
I do not know what to do. Maybe we need to starve the beast. Totally stop working. Pull back at a village, produce your own food and take the risk of avoiding the civilisation altogether, including dying of an absolutely curable injury/infection or just plain starving in the winter. Basically go aboriginal and let them eat their jabs.
I feel the same way. I just don’t know what to do, other than talking to everyone I can and keeping awake and saying no. I have to think that if I need to do something else, it will become clear. Maybe the fact that so many of us are alone, i.e., not organized or in a group, is actually an advantage, a kind of guerrilla warfare where our side doesn’t wear uniforms, have identifiable jobs, etc. But right now it’s just plane scary.
Well that’s enough internet for today. I want to go back to where I read something like this and permanently discount it as the disjointed ramblings of an insane person. Unfortunately, these are exactly the types of conspiracy theories that have become conspiracy facts on a regular basis lately. Maybe Elon will take me to Mars with him. I’m done with the people in charge of this planet.
"Peter Daszak was also practically soiling himself at the prospect of all of this being traced back to USAID and UC Davis."
This may be unrelated but so much of the activity around COVID has invisible ties it seems worth noting here. For many years UC Davis maintained the Scorecard database, the global authority on chemical safety. This was suddenly taken offline in 2020 and my alarm about that closely tied to Twitter permenently banning my account of 12 years with a bogus claim about running multiple spam accounts with no evidence or appeal.
The toxic release data collection was endedby Dubbya Bush in 2002 and tracks closely with Bill Gates entry into gmo food crops and wide spread adoption along w partner chemicals used in unprecidented quantaties despite NEVER being evaluated for human health effects.
Maybe there's a connection beyond the fact of targeted censorship and UC Davis role. One thing is for sure it was not done in the public interest.
If an industrial chemical is allowed by law to be released into the environment, most people assume that it must have been tested and evaluated for its potential risks. Unfortunately, this is simply not true. Keeping chemical hazards under control requires information about what kinds of hazards each chemical poses. If the basic tests to check on a chemical's toxicity haven't been conducted, or if the results aren't publicly available, current laws tend to treat that chemical as if it were perfectly safe. For the chemicals being used in large quantities, Scorecard tells you whether or not eight basic types of tests for health and ecological effects have actually been conducted, based on the public record.
Information Needed for Safety Assessment
Could government assess a chemical's safety or risk? For most of the important industrial chemicals in U.S. commerce, government lacks the information to draw any scientifically based conclusion about the degree of risk--or lack of risk--that a chemical may pose when used. For every chemical in the database, Scorecard tells you whether or not the information needed to assess chemical risk is available. If it isn't, no one can accurately claim the chemical is "safe."
Over 4 billion pounds of toxic chemicals are released by industry into the nation's environment each year, including 72 million pounds of recognized carcinogens. Scorecard can give you a detailed report on chemicals being released from any of 20,000 industrial facilities, or a summary report for any area in the country. Scorecard spotlights the top polluters in the U.S., and ranks states and counties by pollutant releases.
A recent podcast discussion with Catherine Fitz Austin here (http://Rofkin.com/stream/15658) in which she says that a depopulation and population weakening effort began in 1998. I was only half paying attention so wasn't watching the screen to see if she had posted evidence but she did mention the release of gmos and the ramping up of vaccine programs.
It's all entwined like their NGO webs and MSM amplifiers. One of my big time, dirtbag hunting heroes for ages.. kinda where here hunt began & timeless classic in seeing the foundations of Wall Street Mafia.
I am pleased that you have highlighted the involvement of Mérieux in the development of the Covid-19 case. However, there is an important element missing that should be investigated: the tests. We know that the Covid-19 epidemic is an epidemic of positive and often false positive tests.
The first tests in China were provided by BioMérieux in record time.
Many "asymptomatic" people tested positive and then showed symptoms. Could someone please analyze these tests and find out what they are made of? Is it possible that they themselves contain a pathogen, graphene oxide, or something else? Why do you need a nasopharyngeal test to detect a virus in aerosols? Vaccines have attracted a lot of attention, but they have overshadowed questions about testing.
Good morning, I will translate it into Dutch, and place it on my blog "zorgdatjenietslaapt.nl" I have noticed that many people do not read the English texts and therefore much information is lost. There are only a few people here in the wet lands who post this material.
Regarding the DARPA brain section: I was deeply involved in the design of semiconductor technology for 25 years, designing the more complex technologies and chips and establishing segments of the manufacturing process. Currently S/C technology is manufacturing at 9nm. So, obviously we can make significant computing components that would accomplish "nanotechnology goals." We know from general examples like heart regulators that both power and signals can be transmitted from an outside signal or power source to an internal device. Magnetic interfaces can accomplish this.
BUT, and a big one.
First my credentials: I have been in AI for 60 years, with a PhD in AI before anyone was talking about it (I had the luxury of building my own degree program.) In addition to all the AI technology, I had a Masters in Biophysics and a major at the PhD level in Biophysics and a couple of related fields. I spent years mapping brains using microelectrodes.
So, the BUT: I am skeptical and feel it would be mortally dangerous to release any semiconductor or foreign "smart biologic" into the blood stream. I fear the consequences would be the same but worse than that of the spike protein. My question is: Are you saying that the vaccines contains something like a semiconductor nanowhatever or a smart biologic?
There are multiple groups now that have stated that the vaccines contain undisclosed ingredients, and all these reports seem to converge on graphene oxide nanoparticles of varying size, shape, and purity:
There is still no solid proof yet that the vaccine contains nanoparticles specifically engineered for mind control, or that the infrastructure for it is in place. However, given that the media have repeatedly stated that there is no way for the vaccines to contain "nanobots" or "microchips" (on the basis that nanomachines would require bulky batteries, or that microchips are too large to pass through a vaccine needle), it is important to point out that the technology exists to create seemingly inert nanoparticles that receive beamed wireless power and are so small that they cannot be seen with the naked eye, which puts the lie to both contentions.
Old GSM towers had fairly conventional directional antennas, or otherwise radiated RF isotropically. Modern 5G systems have beamforming antennas capable of MIMO and can concentrate RF on a single point in three-dimensional space. This means that if someone had nanoparticles embedded in their neurons that were responsive to RF, the dosage could be titrated differently to specific people, even in a crowd. There are two serious engineering challenges with this; choosing a frequency high enough to be received by nanoparticles but low enough to pass between all the water molecules in someone's head. It may be that nanoparticles could be designed to "self-assemble" into larger antennas to pick up longer wavelengths, perhaps by selective doping of those particles (using hydrophilic and hydrophobic interactions, for instance). Another problem is the spatial resolution. Such a system would be able to hit a target no smaller than the general area of someone's head, and would therefore deliver RF to the whole brain. This problem of low resolution could be solved by localizing the nanoparticles themselves to one specific area of the brain that one wishes to stimulate remotely. For instance, the nucleus accumbens, the part of the brain responsible for processing reward stimuli, or the amygdala, the part that processes fear and anxiety.
Graphene oxide, though conductive and capable of responding to external fields, can be quite toxic inside the body. It can act as a network disruptor, affecting the brain simply by chemical action; when graphene oxide was injected into mouse brains, it completely removed their fear of cats:
I agree wholeheartedly that injecting smart dust into people without their knowledge or consent is not only unethical, but also very unsafe, potentially leading to cytotoxicity in various organs and in the circulatory system. Do we have conclusive proof from an authoritative source that this is occurring? Not quite yet, but it is alarming how many disparate groups have put these vials under SEM and Raman microscopy and claim to have discovered undisclosed GO nanoparticles. It is also very alarming to me how starkly authoritarian governments have been about vaccine passes and achieving near 100% vaccination rates. It suggests an ulterior motive.
Going over Dr. James Giordano's work in bioethics and neuroS/T, I couldn't help but notice the allusions to the use of neurotechnology in warfare and in mass social control, and the potential for highly unethical uses of modern neurotechnology to bring about a new paradigm of "cognitive warfare":
For the ruling class, the masses of populists complaining about depressed wages and declining living standards constitute a threat to their power. If there was a way to pacify people by remote, replacing the reward stimuli from lost compensation or material goods, that would be the ultimate innovation in tyranny. Another possibility is deliberately triggering unrest in rival powers by targeting their citizenry, fomenting "color revolutions" by way of cognitive attack. If every major power does this to the citizens of every other nation - deniable cognitive attacks on the citizenry - then we risk falling into a "mad world" where psychosocial instability is the norm.
Ok. So did you happen to read about the Travis Scott Astroworld concert tragedy? Several people were killed, many injured. The MSM story seems to be that people rushed the stage and the victims were trampled. But eyewitness accounts and videos (I saw one at the time) paint a different picture, of people seizing and collapsing on the ground, not being crushed. The incident was described as extremely dark and Satanic. Which, I know, seems extreme, but such is the world we live in. And a concert with massive speakers capable of emitting frequencies of all sorts would be a great place to try out RF, would it not? (Sorry if I’m wrong about this - layperson!) Add to this the Freemason angle that includes the Kardashians and therefore Scott (and again, I can’t believe I’m proposing this as a legitimate thing to look into - a year ago I would have dismissed myself as a complete nut job, but again: such is the world we live in), and it starts to look like an experiment into what this kind of technology can do.
I read about that too, and saw the video of the guy who said people were having heart attacks in the middle of the crowd. I leave it open as a possibility. Although I know that the injections have cardiac implications, and the people in the crowd we're under cardiac distress, deprived of oxygen in the air because of all the people breathing around them, and their bodies compressed. So all those injuries could have been a natural bodily distress process, and it would be traumatic to see that happening, and there wasn't feel good music playing at the time, so I could see the combination perceived as menacing or satanic.
The Bluetooth angle is interesting, I want to do this the next time I'm around vaccinated people.
This blog explains in details how to do the Bluetooth challenge.
Maybe you know about these already, I came across them when investigating nanoparticles. Here are some articles and videos on self-assembly of nanoparticles or nanowires in the body for healthcare diagnostic purposes.
"nanotube wires self-assemble into circuits, rice university"
Yes, we're aware of Rice University and their experiments. It's also rather telling that the DARPA N3 grant proposal itself includes language that explicitly mentions self-assembly as a means of nanoparticle BCI deployment. Due to the rapid pace of technological advancement in this field, there are researchers and bioethicists who are rather openly discussing the risks that BCIs have for human agency:
A two-way BCI of sufficient sophistication would be able to tell when someone is becoming aggressive, and directly neutralize those thoughts with a pacifying counter-stimulus. For soldiers, it could be used to blunt emotions and make one a cold-blooded and logical killer; transhumanists refer to this as "vulcanization", after the Vulcans from Trek.
Imagine the political implications of a technology that is capable of directly manipulating soldiers' brains to turn them into emotionless living bio-drones who are incapable of disobeying or deserting. They could be used to commit all sorts of atrocities against civilians, and they would never even think twice.
Klaus Schwab has written about transhumanism in his own books, albeit obliquely. Read "The Fourth Industrial Revolution" and "Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution" and you'll see it. Everyone looking into this should read his books anyway, because the underlying motive of global economic and sociopolitical transformation is spelled out in plain English.
Wow, frightening possibilities. I'm not sure the general public really knows how far developed these technologies are for humans. I hear the military is more technically advanced than they let on, so maybe that's why they required the vaccines for the military. Thanks for the links! 👍🏼💜
As an anecdote to add, the WEF Twitter accounts posted a video in the past few months describing how they could test your blood and determine from the sample whether you'd had the vaccine. This clearly indicates that something identifiable is in the vaccines which ends up as a permanent element of your blood.
True, but if it were simply a question of antibodies, then a) the convalescent unvaccinated may test positive or b) the vaccinated with low/no antibodies would not test positive. Maybe the video was bullshitting, but it sounded like they claimed they would very accurately identify whether you'd been vaccinated with a single blood sample.
I've shared your substack with my readers
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/iceni-institute-for-coronavirus-emergence?utm_source=url
Thank you very much.
Thank you for this great info although its terrifying we need to know about it to halt it before its too late.
Have you heard of the following? (Per “Daily Expose”)?
Graphene Is Being Transmitted from the “Vaccinated” to Vaccine-Free People
Thank you for this .Prison , throw the key away … please.
NE… needs to be on all the substacks! 😃
That's how I found it! Thank you!
Thanks for your work and for the link:)
Thank you so much, Spartacus, for such meticulous research and insight. Grateful that you’re fighting on the side of light and truth against a world descending into darkness.
I'm still absorbing all this. There is a lot here and some stuff I can use immediately as I work with the state legislature to create appropriate protective legislation for the future. One clerical correction that will help: Never reference a Wikipedia article. I have proven to myself in multiple ways by looking up articles that have been my own experience or in which I have expert knowledge: Wiki is hopelessly corrupt, with revised histories, revised definitions, revised biographies, etc, to fit the ultra-left WEF worldview. (I financially supported Wiki for years, so I don't say this lightly.) I recommend that you remove those and replace with respectable references.
I agree, so I swapped them out. The main draw of those specific five reference articles was that they were free, and, as far as I could tell, both scientifically accurate and easy to read and understand. A lot of articles on the topic of redox physiology are gated behind paywalls. However, I was able to find alternatives for each topic.
My fuzzy memory is fantastic but details slow to stick and longer to trust so it works to revisit material to clear the fog if only briefly. No worries that's what bookmarks are for and they're free. Not enough is free, paywalls give me a big time cramp and page views to undeserving sources rubs me wrong too.
Luckily there's a no tech hack that also promotes my long time favorite Internet Archive Wayback Machine. Pasting a URL will turn up enough corp sources without feeding NYT, WaPo, Guardian and a good swath of paywall content captured by someone w access. Wayback also allows if you wish to link an unchangeable version of Wikipedia and not drive traffic to their site.
Once upon a time decades ago Monsanto's opponents had sizeable contributions there that did help inform before K-Street forces captured the platform but truth is like water it makes new paths to flow freely, lucky us! :~)
https://blog.archive.org/2017/01/25/see-something-save-something/
https://archive.org/web/
Bookmarks are the wrong way to retain access to web-hosted information, Pamela. That information -- particularly if it's contested, important or embarassing -- often gets edited or disappeared.
Your browser can save a webpage and it's contents (under the File: menu, or right-click 'Save As'). Don't neglect to organize your web downloads into meaningful categories by making sub-folders by topic.
Good advice, my bookmarks aren't for backup they're for quicker finding! :~)
Sci-hub is the Robinhood for accessing journal articles
Sepsis can be treated quite effectively with IV Vitamin C, it also kills viruses
why is this not a main treatment when this is known? oh right i can answer that, there's no profit in it for pharma
Ray ,this is so important what Spartacus wrote. Yes it’s very long to read and understand from a medical point of view and corruption involved. Yes Vitamin C helps, but not alone in severe illness .
i said a main treatment not an only treatment. if you look, there are few studies done on IV Vit C treatment but where it has been done the results are incredible, yet in typical pharma fashion they are ignored and even suppressed. it is massive and been known for years but here we are barely used anywhere and we are still 'doing studies' https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31978969/
Ray , I love it ! I used vitamin c , damn pharmacist took it off formulary. Thank you and to everyone reading.
there are different types of Vit C with different absorption, in relation to sepsis, IV levels are required, but for daily protection i would recommend liquid liposomal Vit C, if you get a cold or flu ramp up the dose to every 2h and slowly taper off when you recover
You missed something. The heparin binding sites are only the tip of the amyloidogenesis iceberg. The N-protein inside the virus is insanely amyloidogenic:
- News article: https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210419/SARS-CoV-2-nucleoprotein-can-trigger-ceb1-synuclein-amyloid-fibril-formation.aspx
- Paper: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acschemneuro.1c00666
But it's not just the N-protein. Neutrophil elastase (inflammation-produced enzyme) chops up the spike protein in such a way that the resulting peptides themselves are amyloidogenic. Preprint here, but it may have been published somewhere: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.16.472920v1
We're already seeing amyloid clotting resulting from spike protein subunits: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANmkIIxCQCw
Spanish Flu was followed by a giant wave of deadly proteinopathic diseases in mid-1920s and we can expect the same here.
Well, that's disturbing. Thanks for the info. By the way, did you happen to see this pre-print?
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.02.23.432474v2
I have not seen that and I'm not qualified enough to give an opinion other than it fits the general amyloidogenesis pattern we seem to be seeing. I'm not a doctor or a scientist. I'm just a smart troll, who thought one day that it would be a great troll to write a fiction book about COVID implanting a "ticking time bomb" into our bodies and I knew about Mad Cow Disease, so I started looking for a plausible mechanism by which COVID could generate Mad Cow Disease years or decades later. And then I fell down this rabbit hole and discovered that my trollish theory is actually pretty much happening in real life and Mad Cow is not the only possible proteinopathy.
The problem with proteinopathies seems to be that all important knowledge about it is hidden in bioweapons research, because it would be trivial to weaponize this stuff. If you've got a mad cow, all you need is to aerosolize its brain and have people breathe it in and they die years later.
I'm guessing the US bioweapons guys saw the N-protein and were like "yeah, this is super bad, we can't have a regular vaccine, because it would include the N-protein and that would create proteinopathic diseases years later", so they created a vaccine around the S-protein, but they never figured that neutrophil elastase would chop that up into amyloidogenic peptides, which would act just like the N-protein. This could have been a super smart biohack by the Chinese -- fooling the Americans into creating a vaccine that causes proteinopathies.
When Omicron first came out, its only "sister strain" in the Nextstrain database was "hCoV-19/Russia/SPE-RII-MH17376S/2021" found in St. Petersburg on May 10th 2021. All other alleged "sister strains" of Omicron were added later and backdated. So Omicron is probably a delibaretely designed "natural vaccine" created by Biopreparat in Russia. I would like to see what the amyloidogenic potential of the Omicron N-protein and S-protein peptides is. If they reduced the potential, then it was delibaretely engineered.
Best cure for COVID is probably A-group cannabinoids (CBDA, CBGA, THCA) from raw cannabis plants simply blocking the spike protein by binding to it as per this article: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35007072/
That's how I cured my COVID recently. I only had two days of fever and one day of tiredness.
Have you come across the info below?
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7568239/ Superantigenic character of an insert unique to SARS-CoV-2 spike supported by skewed TCR repertoire in patients with hyperinflammation Sept. 2020
"The binding epitope on S harbors a sequence motif unique to SARS-CoV-2 (not present in other SARS-related coronaviruses), which is highly similar in both sequence and structure to the bacterial superantigen staphylococcal enterotoxin B."
https://www.cell.com/structure/fulltext/S0969-2126(21)00121-0?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0969212621001210%3Fshowall%3Dtrue A monoclonal antibody against staphylococcal enterotoxin B superantigen inhibits SARS-CoV-2 entry in vitro April 2021
https://www.reddit.com/r/cvnews/comments/rdtb0c/omicron_529_staphylococcus_enterotoxin_b_is_a/ "Now look at Omicron spike protein 671-692. Two amino acid changes and one is the infamous proline change near the FCS. Prolines are right angle brackets in proteins. When they change, they alter structure. P681H N679K This may attenuate the SEB toxicity. Fewer Cytokine storms."
Your links are entirely new information to me. I have never seen anything about SEB before, but I have a friend, who has been looking into MIS-C, so I asked him to take a look at the information you provided. Thank you!
It feels like so many of us have stumbled on some small piece of the puzzle.
Would love to read what your friend's comments are, thanks for asking!
He was aware of the study you linked and he thinks this paper points at what to do about it: https://www.jci.org/articles/view/149633
I'm interested in your CBD, CBG, THC concept since I have not recovered fully from Covid last Christmas despite Ivermectin, HCQ, etc.
My mind is slow and I tire very easily. Need a better method to deal with the beast, and it's aftereffects lol!
And so worried about my daughter's generation who have all taken the spike protien mRNA, Lipid Nanoparticles toxin, multiple times..
Sigh. We must fight it on from all directions!!
if you want to go back further trace theKuru experiments at UC Davis, causing SIV cpz / HTLV/HIV then hiv spike added to corona, they've been trying to make zombies of us for half a century, kuru predates mad cow, and CJD
This is a dine and dash on our retirements, mafia style where they kill as many on their way out the door, and keep killing outside the restaurant too. They will and have stopped at nothing to avoid this discovery of theft. Even blow up trade centers that store financial documents, to cover the trail. see https://rumble.com/vq8lpy-financial-system-broken-catherine-austin-fitts-a-must-watch.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=9
Jacquelyn, it started a long time ago. I presented a medical paper years ago in Texas. It was on the transport mechanism of endorphins and enkephalins. Afterwards, I got surrounded by Chinese scientists and my professor and lead researcher in the lab grabbed me and told that I was not to speak to them and said they steal peoples research.
Dad said something about how when you remove the incentive to do good work and be recognized for it, you will have done exactly that. And the Chinese culture has had 100+ years of trying to copy and then 'improve' on other inventions, that is how they built their country, right? Made in China, indeed. I do try and remember that the CCP and many of the Chinese people are not in agreement, just as we are not well represented by our Government. You have to meet and talk to individuals, a challenge.
I am pretty much paralysed by this information. It is so bleak!
It means the push for the vaccines will continue no matter what the side effects and efficacy. The majority of the west is anyways already injected and possibly loaded with those nano BCI devices so we could be very well doomed already. It almost feels like the only viable option is to just run for the caves and leave everything behind. We slept too long and now it is almost too late.
People in Canada stood up and they were attacked by (possibly foreign) police forces without faces and batches. In western europe we also go to protests but not sure if that has changed much.
What you write makes sense but is it actionable? How to resist this future?
It would seem that more eyes are opening. Example: there is an International “Grand Jury”(access on Rumble), per Reiner Fuellmich, that has been occurring recently with world type experts giving evidence as if in a real courtroom for the WORLD to see. While some of the speakers have accents making it a tad more difficult to listen to, many don’t and it’s very worth listening to. Hopefully, more of the world begins to accept the truth and stand behind making changes to prevent future worse scenarios & prosecute the psychopaths responsible!!! It makes my head spin considering the evil disregard for humanity!!!! I’ve been more or less unwell for almost 2 years recognizing something was very off with all this. It did keep me from getting vaxed at least! I mourn greatly for humanity with all the suffering that has occurred and will be occurring in the future!!
I do not know what to do. Maybe we need to starve the beast. Totally stop working. Pull back at a village, produce your own food and take the risk of avoiding the civilisation altogether, including dying of an absolutely curable injury/infection or just plain starving in the winter. Basically go aboriginal and let them eat their jabs.
I feel the same way. I just don’t know what to do, other than talking to everyone I can and keeping awake and saying no. I have to think that if I need to do something else, it will become clear. Maybe the fact that so many of us are alone, i.e., not organized or in a group, is actually an advantage, a kind of guerrilla warfare where our side doesn’t wear uniforms, have identifiable jobs, etc. But right now it’s just plane scary.
Yes! Great idea. Been thinking about how we (The family here on the stacks) can organize. It is frustrating that we can't all get together!
Good idea. I often mention the closest town but should put it next to my name. (I read the RDA newsletter.) Thanks!
Well that’s enough internet for today. I want to go back to where I read something like this and permanently discount it as the disjointed ramblings of an insane person. Unfortunately, these are exactly the types of conspiracy theories that have become conspiracy facts on a regular basis lately. Maybe Elon will take me to Mars with him. I’m done with the people in charge of this planet.
"Peter Daszak was also practically soiling himself at the prospect of all of this being traced back to USAID and UC Davis."
This may be unrelated but so much of the activity around COVID has invisible ties it seems worth noting here. For many years UC Davis maintained the Scorecard database, the global authority on chemical safety. This was suddenly taken offline in 2020 and my alarm about that closely tied to Twitter permenently banning my account of 12 years with a bogus claim about running multiple spam accounts with no evidence or appeal.
The toxic release data collection was endedby Dubbya Bush in 2002 and tracks closely with Bill Gates entry into gmo food crops and wide spread adoption along w partner chemicals used in unprecidented quantaties despite NEVER being evaluated for human health effects.
Maybe there's a connection beyond the fact of targeted censorship and UC Davis role. One thing is for sure it was not done in the public interest.
https://web.archive.org/web/20120917041002/http://scorecard.goodguide.com/chemical-profiles/chems-profile-descriptions.tcl#basic_testing
Basic Testing to Identify Chemical Hazards
If an industrial chemical is allowed by law to be released into the environment, most people assume that it must have been tested and evaluated for its potential risks. Unfortunately, this is simply not true. Keeping chemical hazards under control requires information about what kinds of hazards each chemical poses. If the basic tests to check on a chemical's toxicity haven't been conducted, or if the results aren't publicly available, current laws tend to treat that chemical as if it were perfectly safe. For the chemicals being used in large quantities, Scorecard tells you whether or not eight basic types of tests for health and ecological effects have actually been conducted, based on the public record.
Information Needed for Safety Assessment
Could government assess a chemical's safety or risk? For most of the important industrial chemicals in U.S. commerce, government lacks the information to draw any scientifically based conclusion about the degree of risk--or lack of risk--that a chemical may pose when used. For every chemical in the database, Scorecard tells you whether or not the information needed to assess chemical risk is available. If it isn't, no one can accurately claim the chemical is "safe."
https://web.archive.org/web/20120213000438/http://scorecard.goodguide.com/env-releases/us-map.tcl
Over 4 billion pounds of toxic chemicals are released by industry into the nation's environment each year, including 72 million pounds of recognized carcinogens. Scorecard can give you a detailed report on chemicals being released from any of 20,000 industrial facilities, or a summary report for any area in the country. Scorecard spotlights the top polluters in the U.S., and ranks states and counties by pollutant releases.
A recent podcast discussion with Catherine Fitz Austin here (http://Rofkin.com/stream/15658) in which she says that a depopulation and population weakening effort began in 1998. I was only half paying attention so wasn't watching the screen to see if she had posted evidence but she did mention the release of gmos and the ramping up of vaccine programs.
It's all entwined like their NGO webs and MSM amplifiers. One of my big time, dirtbag hunting heroes for ages.. kinda where here hunt began & timeless classic in seeing the foundations of Wall Street Mafia.
https://home.solari.com/
https://dillonreadandco.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/AustinFitts_DillonRead.pdfhttps://www.dunwalke.com/resources/organizations.htm
Did you name your substack after the Iceni celts?
As a matter of fact, we did. It's also an acronym. Well, a backronym. The Institute for Coronavirus Emergence Nonprofit Intelligence.
I am pleased that you have highlighted the involvement of Mérieux in the development of the Covid-19 case. However, there is an important element missing that should be investigated: the tests. We know that the Covid-19 epidemic is an epidemic of positive and often false positive tests.
Look here for example: https://www.fondation-merieux.org/ce-que-nous-faisons/covid-19-la-fondation-merieux-apporte-son-expertise-diagnostic-et-recherche-pour-renforcer-ses-laboratoires-partenaires-face-a-lepidemie-sur-le-terrain/
The first tests in China were provided by BioMérieux in record time.
Many "asymptomatic" people tested positive and then showed symptoms. Could someone please analyze these tests and find out what they are made of? Is it possible that they themselves contain a pathogen, graphene oxide, or something else? Why do you need a nasopharyngeal test to detect a virus in aerosols? Vaccines have attracted a lot of attention, but they have overshadowed questions about testing.
Good morning, I will translate it into Dutch, and place it on my blog "zorgdatjenietslaapt.nl" I have noticed that many people do not read the English texts and therefore much information is lost. There are only a few people here in the wet lands who post this material.
Very good. All of our documents and articles are released under Creative Commons (CC BY-SA) and are free to use.
What a rabbit hole.
Regarding the DARPA brain section: I was deeply involved in the design of semiconductor technology for 25 years, designing the more complex technologies and chips and establishing segments of the manufacturing process. Currently S/C technology is manufacturing at 9nm. So, obviously we can make significant computing components that would accomplish "nanotechnology goals." We know from general examples like heart regulators that both power and signals can be transmitted from an outside signal or power source to an internal device. Magnetic interfaces can accomplish this.
BUT, and a big one.
First my credentials: I have been in AI for 60 years, with a PhD in AI before anyone was talking about it (I had the luxury of building my own degree program.) In addition to all the AI technology, I had a Masters in Biophysics and a major at the PhD level in Biophysics and a couple of related fields. I spent years mapping brains using microelectrodes.
So, the BUT: I am skeptical and feel it would be mortally dangerous to release any semiconductor or foreign "smart biologic" into the blood stream. I fear the consequences would be the same but worse than that of the spike protein. My question is: Are you saying that the vaccines contains something like a semiconductor nanowhatever or a smart biologic?
There are multiple groups now that have stated that the vaccines contain undisclosed ingredients, and all these reports seem to converge on graphene oxide nanoparticles of varying size, shape, and purity:
https://www.globalresearch.ca/graphene-oxide-detection-aqueous-suspension/5749529
https://seemorerocks.is/german-whistleblower-dr-andreas-noack-was-murdered/
https://ukcitizen2021.org/Case_Briefing_Document_and_lab_report_Ref_AUC_101_Report%20.pdf
There is still no solid proof yet that the vaccine contains nanoparticles specifically engineered for mind control, or that the infrastructure for it is in place. However, given that the media have repeatedly stated that there is no way for the vaccines to contain "nanobots" or "microchips" (on the basis that nanomachines would require bulky batteries, or that microchips are too large to pass through a vaccine needle), it is important to point out that the technology exists to create seemingly inert nanoparticles that receive beamed wireless power and are so small that they cannot be seen with the naked eye, which puts the lie to both contentions.
Old GSM towers had fairly conventional directional antennas, or otherwise radiated RF isotropically. Modern 5G systems have beamforming antennas capable of MIMO and can concentrate RF on a single point in three-dimensional space. This means that if someone had nanoparticles embedded in their neurons that were responsive to RF, the dosage could be titrated differently to specific people, even in a crowd. There are two serious engineering challenges with this; choosing a frequency high enough to be received by nanoparticles but low enough to pass between all the water molecules in someone's head. It may be that nanoparticles could be designed to "self-assemble" into larger antennas to pick up longer wavelengths, perhaps by selective doping of those particles (using hydrophilic and hydrophobic interactions, for instance). Another problem is the spatial resolution. Such a system would be able to hit a target no smaller than the general area of someone's head, and would therefore deliver RF to the whole brain. This problem of low resolution could be solved by localizing the nanoparticles themselves to one specific area of the brain that one wishes to stimulate remotely. For instance, the nucleus accumbens, the part of the brain responsible for processing reward stimuli, or the amygdala, the part that processes fear and anxiety.
Graphene oxide, though conductive and capable of responding to external fields, can be quite toxic inside the body. It can act as a network disruptor, affecting the brain simply by chemical action; when graphene oxide was injected into mouse brains, it completely removed their fear of cats:
https://graphene-flagship.eu/graphene/news/soothing-the-symptoms-of-anxiety-with-graphene-oxide/
GO also affects redox physiology, promoting oxidative stress:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC8012771/
I agree wholeheartedly that injecting smart dust into people without their knowledge or consent is not only unethical, but also very unsafe, potentially leading to cytotoxicity in various organs and in the circulatory system. Do we have conclusive proof from an authoritative source that this is occurring? Not quite yet, but it is alarming how many disparate groups have put these vials under SEM and Raman microscopy and claim to have discovered undisclosed GO nanoparticles. It is also very alarming to me how starkly authoritarian governments have been about vaccine passes and achieving near 100% vaccination rates. It suggests an ulterior motive.
Going over Dr. James Giordano's work in bioethics and neuroS/T, I couldn't help but notice the allusions to the use of neurotechnology in warfare and in mass social control, and the potential for highly unethical uses of modern neurotechnology to bring about a new paradigm of "cognitive warfare":
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11017-014-9278-4
https://nsiteam.com/social/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/SMA-Invited-Perspective_Emerging-NeuroST_Giordano-and-DiEuliis_FINAL.pdf
For the ruling class, the masses of populists complaining about depressed wages and declining living standards constitute a threat to their power. If there was a way to pacify people by remote, replacing the reward stimuli from lost compensation or material goods, that would be the ultimate innovation in tyranny. Another possibility is deliberately triggering unrest in rival powers by targeting their citizenry, fomenting "color revolutions" by way of cognitive attack. If every major power does this to the citizens of every other nation - deniable cognitive attacks on the citizenry - then we risk falling into a "mad world" where psychosocial instability is the norm.
Ok. So did you happen to read about the Travis Scott Astroworld concert tragedy? Several people were killed, many injured. The MSM story seems to be that people rushed the stage and the victims were trampled. But eyewitness accounts and videos (I saw one at the time) paint a different picture, of people seizing and collapsing on the ground, not being crushed. The incident was described as extremely dark and Satanic. Which, I know, seems extreme, but such is the world we live in. And a concert with massive speakers capable of emitting frequencies of all sorts would be a great place to try out RF, would it not? (Sorry if I’m wrong about this - layperson!) Add to this the Freemason angle that includes the Kardashians and therefore Scott (and again, I can’t believe I’m proposing this as a legitimate thing to look into - a year ago I would have dismissed myself as a complete nut job, but again: such is the world we live in), and it starts to look like an experiment into what this kind of technology can do.
I read about that too, and saw the video of the guy who said people were having heart attacks in the middle of the crowd. I leave it open as a possibility. Although I know that the injections have cardiac implications, and the people in the crowd we're under cardiac distress, deprived of oxygen in the air because of all the people breathing around them, and their bodies compressed. So all those injuries could have been a natural bodily distress process, and it would be traumatic to see that happening, and there wasn't feel good music playing at the time, so I could see the combination perceived as menacing or satanic.
The Bluetooth angle is interesting, I want to do this the next time I'm around vaccinated people.
This blog explains in details how to do the Bluetooth challenge.
https://www.hopegirlblog.com/2022/03/27/the-bluetooth-challenge-explained-why-covid-vaxxed-people-are-emitting-bluetooth-codes-and-how-you-can-see-it-for-yourself/
This video explains how to find people on Bluetooth as well, by downloading a Bluetooth scanning app to your phone and turning on GPS and Bluetooth.
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/are-you-or-someone-around-you-chipped-how-to-find-out/
Maybe you know about these already, I came across them when investigating nanoparticles. Here are some articles and videos on self-assembly of nanoparticles or nanowires in the body for healthcare diagnostic purposes.
"nanotube wires self-assemble into circuits, rice university"
https://www.designnews.com/alternative-energy/so-whats-teslaphoresis-and-how-can-it-make-self-assembling-circuits
https://www.bitchute.com/video/uTdl6HTYQ6Ij/
https://www.designnews.com/alternative-energy/so-whats-teslaphoresis-and-how-can-it-make-self-assembling-circuits
https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2011/01/virus-sized-transistors
Yes, we're aware of Rice University and their experiments. It's also rather telling that the DARPA N3 grant proposal itself includes language that explicitly mentions self-assembly as a means of nanoparticle BCI deployment. Due to the rapid pace of technological advancement in this field, there are researchers and bioethicists who are rather openly discussing the risks that BCIs have for human agency:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-019-00087-2
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/articles/PMC3921579/
https://vce.usc.edu/volume-5-issue-2/the-ethical-challenges-of-neural-technology/
A two-way BCI of sufficient sophistication would be able to tell when someone is becoming aggressive, and directly neutralize those thoughts with a pacifying counter-stimulus. For soldiers, it could be used to blunt emotions and make one a cold-blooded and logical killer; transhumanists refer to this as "vulcanization", after the Vulcans from Trek.
https://jetpress.org/v23/evans2.pdf
Imagine the political implications of a technology that is capable of directly manipulating soldiers' brains to turn them into emotionless living bio-drones who are incapable of disobeying or deserting. They could be used to commit all sorts of atrocities against civilians, and they would never even think twice.
Klaus Schwab has written about transhumanism in his own books, albeit obliquely. Read "The Fourth Industrial Revolution" and "Shaping the Future of the Fourth Industrial Revolution" and you'll see it. Everyone looking into this should read his books anyway, because the underlying motive of global economic and sociopolitical transformation is spelled out in plain English.
Wow, frightening possibilities. I'm not sure the general public really knows how far developed these technologies are for humans. I hear the military is more technically advanced than they let on, so maybe that's why they required the vaccines for the military. Thanks for the links! 👍🏼💜
As an anecdote to add, the WEF Twitter accounts posted a video in the past few months describing how they could test your blood and determine from the sample whether you'd had the vaccine. This clearly indicates that something identifiable is in the vaccines which ends up as a permanent element of your blood.
This could be an antibody test. The vaccine does cause the body to produce antibodies, and those antibodies can be measured in the blood.
Although I am aware that lipid nanoparticles have been found in blood plasma.
True, but if it were simply a question of antibodies, then a) the convalescent unvaccinated may test positive or b) the vaccinated with low/no antibodies would not test positive. Maybe the video was bullshitting, but it sounded like they claimed they would very accurately identify whether you'd been vaccinated with a single blood sample.
All I can think right now: Dear God, Please have mercy upon our souls and save us from this madness.
Beyond thorough. Thank you.