Thank you so much, Spartacus, for such meticulous research and insight. Grateful that you’re fighting on the side of light and truth against a world descending into darkness.
I'm still absorbing all this. There is a lot here and some stuff I can use immediately as I work with the state legislature to create appropriate protective legislation for the future. One clerical correction that will help: Never reference a Wikipedia article. I have proven to myself in multiple ways by looking up articles that have been my own experience or in which I have expert knowledge: Wiki is hopelessly corrupt, with revised histories, revised definitions, revised biographies, etc, to fit the ultra-left WEF worldview. (I financially supported Wiki for years, so I don't say this lightly.) I recommend that you remove those and replace with respectable references.
You missed something. The heparin binding sites are only the tip of the amyloidogenesis iceberg. The N-protein inside the virus is insanely amyloidogenic:
But it's not just the N-protein. Neutrophil elastase (inflammation-produced enzyme) chops up the spike protein in such a way that the resulting peptides themselves are amyloidogenic. Preprint here, but it may have been published somewhere: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.16.472920v1
I am pretty much paralysed by this information. It is so bleak!
It means the push for the vaccines will continue no matter what the side effects and efficacy. The majority of the west is anyways already injected and possibly loaded with those nano BCI devices so we could be very well doomed already. It almost feels like the only viable option is to just run for the caves and leave everything behind. We slept too long and now it is almost too late.
People in Canada stood up and they were attacked by (possibly foreign) police forces without faces and batches. In western europe we also go to protests but not sure if that has changed much.
What you write makes sense but is it actionable? How to resist this future?
Well that’s enough internet for today. I want to go back to where I read something like this and permanently discount it as the disjointed ramblings of an insane person. Unfortunately, these are exactly the types of conspiracy theories that have become conspiracy facts on a regular basis lately. Maybe Elon will take me to Mars with him. I’m done with the people in charge of this planet.
"Peter Daszak was also practically soiling himself at the prospect of all of this being traced back to USAID and UC Davis."
This may be unrelated but so much of the activity around COVID has invisible ties it seems worth noting here. For many years UC Davis maintained the Scorecard database, the global authority on chemical safety. This was suddenly taken offline in 2020 and my alarm about that closely tied to Twitter permenently banning my account of 12 years with a bogus claim about running multiple spam accounts with no evidence or appeal.
The toxic release data collection was endedby Dubbya Bush in 2002 and tracks closely with Bill Gates entry into gmo food crops and wide spread adoption along w partner chemicals used in unprecidented quantaties despite NEVER being evaluated for human health effects.
Maybe there's a connection beyond the fact of targeted censorship and UC Davis role. One thing is for sure it was not done in the public interest.
If an industrial chemical is allowed by law to be released into the environment, most people assume that it must have been tested and evaluated for its potential risks. Unfortunately, this is simply not true. Keeping chemical hazards under control requires information about what kinds of hazards each chemical poses. If the basic tests to check on a chemical's toxicity haven't been conducted, or if the results aren't publicly available, current laws tend to treat that chemical as if it were perfectly safe. For the chemicals being used in large quantities, Scorecard tells you whether or not eight basic types of tests for health and ecological effects have actually been conducted, based on the public record.
Information Needed for Safety Assessment
Could government assess a chemical's safety or risk? For most of the important industrial chemicals in U.S. commerce, government lacks the information to draw any scientifically based conclusion about the degree of risk--or lack of risk--that a chemical may pose when used. For every chemical in the database, Scorecard tells you whether or not the information needed to assess chemical risk is available. If it isn't, no one can accurately claim the chemical is "safe."
Over 4 billion pounds of toxic chemicals are released by industry into the nation's environment each year, including 72 million pounds of recognized carcinogens. Scorecard can give you a detailed report on chemicals being released from any of 20,000 industrial facilities, or a summary report for any area in the country. Scorecard spotlights the top polluters in the U.S., and ranks states and counties by pollutant releases.
I am pleased that you have highlighted the involvement of Mérieux in the development of the Covid-19 case. However, there is an important element missing that should be investigated: the tests. We know that the Covid-19 epidemic is an epidemic of positive and often false positive tests.
The first tests in China were provided by BioMérieux in record time.
Many "asymptomatic" people tested positive and then showed symptoms. Could someone please analyze these tests and find out what they are made of? Is it possible that they themselves contain a pathogen, graphene oxide, or something else? Why do you need a nasopharyngeal test to detect a virus in aerosols? Vaccines have attracted a lot of attention, but they have overshadowed questions about testing.
Feb 26, 2022·edited Feb 26, 2022Liked by Spartacus
Good morning, I will translate it into Dutch, and place it on my blog "zorgdatjenietslaapt.nl" I have noticed that many people do not read the English texts and therefore much information is lost. There are only a few people here in the wet lands who post this material.
Regarding the DARPA brain section: I was deeply involved in the design of semiconductor technology for 25 years, designing the more complex technologies and chips and establishing segments of the manufacturing process. Currently S/C technology is manufacturing at 9nm. So, obviously we can make significant computing components that would accomplish "nanotechnology goals." We know from general examples like heart regulators that both power and signals can be transmitted from an outside signal or power source to an internal device. Magnetic interfaces can accomplish this.
BUT, and a big one.
First my credentials: I have been in AI for 60 years, with a PhD in AI before anyone was talking about it (I had the luxury of building my own degree program.) In addition to all the AI technology, I had a Masters in Biophysics and a major at the PhD level in Biophysics and a couple of related fields. I spent years mapping brains using microelectrodes.
So, the BUT: I am skeptical and feel it would be mortally dangerous to release any semiconductor or foreign "smart biologic" into the blood stream. I fear the consequences would be the same but worse than that of the spike protein. My question is: Are you saying that the vaccines contains something like a semiconductor nanowhatever or a smart biologic?
I've shared your substack with my readers
https://nakedemperor.substack.com/p/iceni-institute-for-coronavirus-emergence?utm_source=url
Thank you so much, Spartacus, for such meticulous research and insight. Grateful that you’re fighting on the side of light and truth against a world descending into darkness.
I'm still absorbing all this. There is a lot here and some stuff I can use immediately as I work with the state legislature to create appropriate protective legislation for the future. One clerical correction that will help: Never reference a Wikipedia article. I have proven to myself in multiple ways by looking up articles that have been my own experience or in which I have expert knowledge: Wiki is hopelessly corrupt, with revised histories, revised definitions, revised biographies, etc, to fit the ultra-left WEF worldview. (I financially supported Wiki for years, so I don't say this lightly.) I recommend that you remove those and replace with respectable references.
Sepsis can be treated quite effectively with IV Vitamin C, it also kills viruses
why is this not a main treatment when this is known? oh right i can answer that, there's no profit in it for pharma
You missed something. The heparin binding sites are only the tip of the amyloidogenesis iceberg. The N-protein inside the virus is insanely amyloidogenic:
- News article: https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210419/SARS-CoV-2-nucleoprotein-can-trigger-ceb1-synuclein-amyloid-fibril-formation.aspx
- Paper: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acschemneuro.1c00666
But it's not just the N-protein. Neutrophil elastase (inflammation-produced enzyme) chops up the spike protein in such a way that the resulting peptides themselves are amyloidogenic. Preprint here, but it may have been published somewhere: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.16.472920v1
We're already seeing amyloid clotting resulting from spike protein subunits: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANmkIIxCQCw
Spanish Flu was followed by a giant wave of deadly proteinopathic diseases in mid-1920s and we can expect the same here.
This is a dine and dash on our retirements, mafia style where they kill as many on their way out the door, and keep killing outside the restaurant too. They will and have stopped at nothing to avoid this discovery of theft. Even blow up trade centers that store financial documents, to cover the trail. see https://rumble.com/vq8lpy-financial-system-broken-catherine-austin-fitts-a-must-watch.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=9
I am pretty much paralysed by this information. It is so bleak!
It means the push for the vaccines will continue no matter what the side effects and efficacy. The majority of the west is anyways already injected and possibly loaded with those nano BCI devices so we could be very well doomed already. It almost feels like the only viable option is to just run for the caves and leave everything behind. We slept too long and now it is almost too late.
People in Canada stood up and they were attacked by (possibly foreign) police forces without faces and batches. In western europe we also go to protests but not sure if that has changed much.
What you write makes sense but is it actionable? How to resist this future?
I am Spartacus!
Well that’s enough internet for today. I want to go back to where I read something like this and permanently discount it as the disjointed ramblings of an insane person. Unfortunately, these are exactly the types of conspiracy theories that have become conspiracy facts on a regular basis lately. Maybe Elon will take me to Mars with him. I’m done with the people in charge of this planet.
"Peter Daszak was also practically soiling himself at the prospect of all of this being traced back to USAID and UC Davis."
This may be unrelated but so much of the activity around COVID has invisible ties it seems worth noting here. For many years UC Davis maintained the Scorecard database, the global authority on chemical safety. This was suddenly taken offline in 2020 and my alarm about that closely tied to Twitter permenently banning my account of 12 years with a bogus claim about running multiple spam accounts with no evidence or appeal.
The toxic release data collection was endedby Dubbya Bush in 2002 and tracks closely with Bill Gates entry into gmo food crops and wide spread adoption along w partner chemicals used in unprecidented quantaties despite NEVER being evaluated for human health effects.
Maybe there's a connection beyond the fact of targeted censorship and UC Davis role. One thing is for sure it was not done in the public interest.
https://web.archive.org/web/20120917041002/http://scorecard.goodguide.com/chemical-profiles/chems-profile-descriptions.tcl#basic_testing
Basic Testing to Identify Chemical Hazards
If an industrial chemical is allowed by law to be released into the environment, most people assume that it must have been tested and evaluated for its potential risks. Unfortunately, this is simply not true. Keeping chemical hazards under control requires information about what kinds of hazards each chemical poses. If the basic tests to check on a chemical's toxicity haven't been conducted, or if the results aren't publicly available, current laws tend to treat that chemical as if it were perfectly safe. For the chemicals being used in large quantities, Scorecard tells you whether or not eight basic types of tests for health and ecological effects have actually been conducted, based on the public record.
Information Needed for Safety Assessment
Could government assess a chemical's safety or risk? For most of the important industrial chemicals in U.S. commerce, government lacks the information to draw any scientifically based conclusion about the degree of risk--or lack of risk--that a chemical may pose when used. For every chemical in the database, Scorecard tells you whether or not the information needed to assess chemical risk is available. If it isn't, no one can accurately claim the chemical is "safe."
https://web.archive.org/web/20120213000438/http://scorecard.goodguide.com/env-releases/us-map.tcl
Over 4 billion pounds of toxic chemicals are released by industry into the nation's environment each year, including 72 million pounds of recognized carcinogens. Scorecard can give you a detailed report on chemicals being released from any of 20,000 industrial facilities, or a summary report for any area in the country. Scorecard spotlights the top polluters in the U.S., and ranks states and counties by pollutant releases.
Did you name your substack after the Iceni celts?
I am pleased that you have highlighted the involvement of Mérieux in the development of the Covid-19 case. However, there is an important element missing that should be investigated: the tests. We know that the Covid-19 epidemic is an epidemic of positive and often false positive tests.
Look here for example: https://www.fondation-merieux.org/ce-que-nous-faisons/covid-19-la-fondation-merieux-apporte-son-expertise-diagnostic-et-recherche-pour-renforcer-ses-laboratoires-partenaires-face-a-lepidemie-sur-le-terrain/
The first tests in China were provided by BioMérieux in record time.
Many "asymptomatic" people tested positive and then showed symptoms. Could someone please analyze these tests and find out what they are made of? Is it possible that they themselves contain a pathogen, graphene oxide, or something else? Why do you need a nasopharyngeal test to detect a virus in aerosols? Vaccines have attracted a lot of attention, but they have overshadowed questions about testing.
Good morning, I will translate it into Dutch, and place it on my blog "zorgdatjenietslaapt.nl" I have noticed that many people do not read the English texts and therefore much information is lost. There are only a few people here in the wet lands who post this material.
What a rabbit hole.
Regarding the DARPA brain section: I was deeply involved in the design of semiconductor technology for 25 years, designing the more complex technologies and chips and establishing segments of the manufacturing process. Currently S/C technology is manufacturing at 9nm. So, obviously we can make significant computing components that would accomplish "nanotechnology goals." We know from general examples like heart regulators that both power and signals can be transmitted from an outside signal or power source to an internal device. Magnetic interfaces can accomplish this.
BUT, and a big one.
First my credentials: I have been in AI for 60 years, with a PhD in AI before anyone was talking about it (I had the luxury of building my own degree program.) In addition to all the AI technology, I had a Masters in Biophysics and a major at the PhD level in Biophysics and a couple of related fields. I spent years mapping brains using microelectrodes.
So, the BUT: I am skeptical and feel it would be mortally dangerous to release any semiconductor or foreign "smart biologic" into the blood stream. I fear the consequences would be the same but worse than that of the spike protein. My question is: Are you saying that the vaccines contains something like a semiconductor nanowhatever or a smart biologic?
All I can think right now: Dear God, Please have mercy upon our souls and save us from this madness.